Cold Mountain

Paul Greenwood reviews

Cold Mountain
Cover

  • Cert:
  • Running time: 152 minutes
  • Year: 2003
  • Released: 2nd January 2004
  • Widescreen Ratio: 2.35:1
  • Rating: 5/10

Director:

    Anthony Minghella

(The English Patient, The Talented Mr. Ripley)

Cast:

    Inman: Jude Law
    Ada Monroe: Nicole Kidman
    Ruby Thewes: Renee Zellweger
    Reverend Monroe: Donald Sutherland
    Teague: Ray Winstone
    Stobrod: Brendan Gleeson
    Veasey: Philip Seymour Hoffman
    Sara: Natalie Portman
    Sally Swanger: Kathy Baker
    Esco Swanger: James Gammon
    Junior: Giovanni Ribisi

You need to be very careful when going to the cinema atthis time of the year.

We’re right in the middle of awards season, the time when the studios releasetheir big guns in an attempt to win an Oscar. This usually means a big budget,star-laden period film that tries to blend craft and worthiness with acommercial edge – see The English Patient, A Beautiful Mind andShakespeare in Love for recent examples.

Now Anthony Minghella is attempting to repeat the success of The EnglishPatient with his latest, the American Civil War epic, Cold Mountain.Unfortunately, Cold Mountain is neither artful nor worthy – it’s a soap opera,its central romance as convincing as a Barbara Cartland novel or a Troy McCluremovie and, though it looks wonderful and is expertly played, it’s ultimatelypaper-thin and vacuous.



Ada Monroe (Nicole Kidman) is an educated and well groomed young womanwho moves with her minister father (Donald Sutherland) to the smallNorth Carolina community of Cold Mountain from war ravaged Charleston. Thereshe meets the taciturn labourer, Inman (Jude Law) and the pair quicklydevelop an interest in each other. But, this being America in the 1860s, alittle thing called The War of the Union intrudes upon their infatuation andbefore they can barely steal a kiss, Inman is off shooting Yankees.

When Ada’s father dies (in a scene so telegraphed, you’d think the audiencehad never seen a movie before) she is left alone and helpless on their farm,with only the kindness of her neighbour keeping her from complete destitution.Just as she’s almost at breaking point, help arrives in the shape of the feistyRuby (Renee Zellweger, playing it like she’s auditioning for the CalamityJane remake) and between them they get the land back into shape whilebecoming close friends. Inman meanwhile, having been wounded in battle,absconds from his hospital base to try and make it back to Cold Mountain andto Ada.

The most glaring weakness of Cold Mountain is the fragility of the centralplot. Although I haven’t read Charles Frazier’s novel on which the film is based,I can only assume it hasn’t been changed too much, in which case, Frazier hasto take most of the blame. How can we possibly care whether Inman makes itback to Ada when all they shared together was one kiss and a glass of cider?Without the belief that Inman’s very being depends on his getting home to thelove of his life, all he is is a deserter and therefore a coward. Yes, itwould be nicer to be at home snuggling up to Nicole Kidman than in a trenchwatching your buddy’s leg getting blown off, but Inman’s supposed motivation isspurious at best.



Of far greater interest are the secondary plot threads concerning Ada and Rubytrying to survive and prosper on the farm and the vicious (if slightlycaricatured) vigilante tactics of the Homeguard, led by Ray Winstone, whodisingenuously use their charter to apprehend deserters to terrorise thecommunity. Indeed, there are moments in these passages, fleeting moments, whenCold Mountain threatens to attain the beauty of the great Civil War films likeGlory,Ride With the Devilor The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.

Neither is Inman’s journey without its compelling aspects, but his eventualgoal is of little concern. And although it’s fun to spot them, it’s still mildlydistracting that the people whom he comes across on his travels are all well-knownfaces (Giovanni Ribisi as a deceitful farmer, Natalie Portman asa lonely young widow). Special mention though should go to Dustin Hoffman,the best screen actor of the last five years, who is as brilliant as everplaying against type as a randy preacher.

Review copyright © Paul Greenwood, 2004.E-mail Paul Greenwood

[Up to the top of this page]


Loading…